There are 2 ways to think: Bond style, with tools from Q, or Bourne style (copied by Bond 2.0), with whatever is around. I prefer latter.
Conversation
Replying to
Isn't this in direct contradiction with Alan Kay's perspective is worth 80?
1
Show replies
Replying to
so Bourne's bricolage and Bond's toolkit share a deep family resemblance. What am I missing?
1
Replying to
I don't see the resemblance. It's waterfall vs agile, purist vs pragmatic.
3
Show replies
Replying to
:: adding in Sherlock Holmes and Macgyver. Creativity built on on top of a repeatable and fairly measurable (down to seconds) process.
Replying to
you forgot Ghengis style - with the throats of your enemies in your hand.
2
Replying to
I kind of buy that, but if we push the analogy, both agent's skills were dependent on stores of tacit knowledge developed previously...


