2/ Has-beens are those who have to accept that their dominance must decline.
-
-
-
3/ Never-was-es are those who anointed successors who must accept that their claims are nullified by the decline of the has-beens
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@vgr interesting, but this is posed (at least on my reading) as if an equilibrium between these 3 can be reached; not sure that there is one -
@GordonBrianR Of course not an equilibrium. An evolving detente. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.