1/ WaPo title, "Come on, Silicon Valley, you can do better than this" gets at the root of what non-SVers don't get: there's no there there.
Conversation
Replying to
2/ Even if Yo turns out to have been an elaborate long troll dreamed up by stoners and drunk VCs, it is, miraculously, *still* legit. Why?
1
1
Replying to
3/ Efficient markets are about the right to disagree about what is important. Even if some decide the most imp. use of $1mm is a joke.
2
2
Replying to
4/ Which is not to say Yo is a joke. But even if it was intended as one, market which made it a viral hit is smarter than those behind it.
1
1
Replying to
5/ Unless you can predict the *precise* future course of something like Yo, the market knows things you don't.
3
1
1
Replying to
6/ Worst case is better than you think: $1mm gets recycled fast, a couple of kids learn marketing, ecosystem gets smarter about virality
1
Replying to
8/ So sure, make fun of it, evangelize your own pet entrepreneurial foci more, but don't assume this is a sign of SV being broken.
2
Replying to
9/ In fact, the fact that old economy ONLY does plausibly justifiable things chosen by committees of wise graybeards should arouse suspicion
1
2
5
Show replies
Replying to
so Yo is like NASA going to the moon? People can mock the utility of putting foot on moon but byproducts justify it?
2
Replying to
The point is you don't HAVE to justify it. Market-based capital allocation does not have to be justified at macro level.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
Not minimizing potential, it's the lemming like flock to "traction" bothersome. It's still a side project w/ unproven utility at best.


