You can't. This is a political problem too.
Conversation
Replying to
Of course it is. Technical people accept it is a political problem too. Unfortunately political people don't reciprocate.
1
Replying to
Which has people doing the equivalent of trying to legislate pi=3 type regulatory regimes. Or repeal law of gravity.
2
Replying to
(or rely on the goodwill of the players, which money has unfortunately entirely corroded.)
3
Replying to
The fact that they are *able* to adopt a monopoly position and blackmail is itself a cons. of tech issues.
1
Replying to
Ignoring something as technically meaningful as hard/soft/non real-time simply because political problems arise = bad tech.
3
Replying to
The Internet has dealt quite well without hard-scheduled QoS for 40 years, despite the continued squawking of telco engineers.
2
1
Replying to
And again, I am totally with principle of combating monopoly. Just not with arbitrary tech line in the sand.
3
Replying to
But if Cablevision refuses to accept real competition, then they're gonna get tied up so they don't kill the thing we care about.
1
Replying to
QoS/latency over all other innovations at the explicit cost of decentralized systems.
1
Replying to
...and you're doing this in a moment where we see that decentralization is our only hope against ubiquitous state surveillance.
1
Replying to
Heh, so I'll say good night with this piece of mine on that that should make you pop a vein then. ribbonfarm.com/2014/01/10/con
4
1
Show replies
Replying to
Great. You're espousing a route that chooses to fix (assuming those queuing algorithms they claim actually exist, which we do no know)

