Loosely: from 'what is not explicitly prescribed is implicitly forbidden' to 'what is not explicitly forbidden is implicitly allowed' 2/2
Conversation
Replying to
Disagree. This is the old Common vs. Civil law tradition.
1
Replying to
talking about social mores/culture more than legal tradition
1
Replying to
Understood. Think analysis depends on time scale. Also subject to sudden reversals. Tech advances have been a tailwind, thus far.
1
Replying to
History suggests non-monotonic, non-linear change.
1
Replying to
Consider your real namesake's regimen of prescribed fasts covering large fraction of eating choices vs. high choice eating.
Replying to
Am interested in the non-140 char version of this thought.
1

