you're turning it into a much stronger statement. Neither necessary nor sufficient. Sometimes useful, that's all.
Conversation
Replying to
Common thread of the best I've studied. All seem to have have a unique philosophical worldview.
1
1
Replying to
Also what I look for when trying to understand whether I want to work with someone or not. Didn't realize it till I read that article.
1
1
Replying to
most are predictable in how they think once you learn where they're from. It's those who think/feel uniquely outside of that =I like.
1
1
Replying to
so philosophy necessary for entrepreneurs to get Chris to like them :p
1
1
Replying to
want to work with them, not like them...
I usually like everyone until I don't.
I do struggle with the SF scenester entrepreneur tho.
1
Replying to
"work with" is stronger than "like." "Like everyone until I don't" = "I don't know if I like X until I try working with them."
1
Replying to
I like a lot of people, man. I'm a people liking machine.
Typically not a fan of elitists and the rich kids of Instragram-types.
3
Replying to
also, academic elitists.
Why I like Stanford types much more than the other school.
There's humility and curiosity w/intelligence.
1
Replying to
basically, if you like almost everybody, and you drop them very easily, "like" means almost nothing.
Replying to
yes Facebook has commoditized liking something but generally I'm an optimist's optimist.
I'm a true passionate fan of only a few tho.
1
1
Replying to
precisely... "like" has been devalued to the level of common civilty. Friendship in an era is defined by stress imposed on it.
1
1
Show replies

