Conversation

Serious answer: with all the financial, social, political, and org constraints he's introduced into the picture, there really is only one option: a breakthrough differentiating technology nobody else can replicate. The "hardcore engineering" org idea better deliver a moonshot
Quote Tweet
What should Twitter do next?
9
44
Moonshot needed = 0.13 time machines
Quote Tweet
The more trust you burn through, the bigger the invention gap you create and have to fill. If you burn through enough trust, the only invention that can save you is a time machine.
Show this thread
2
18
Status quo ante at lower cost is not really an option here. He has 13b in new debt to service, and a private stock that would now probably be realistically worth like $10. Cutting labor is likely not enough to even return to profitability, let alone justify the purchase valuation
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
Here's an alternative case: all he has to do is survive what he's done and he'll be hailed as the turnaround artist of the century justified or not. Cutting 80% of staff without a firm exploding is an achievement!
Replying to
XApp built around payments and tiktok/YouTube competing video with paid reach and creator revenue percentages. He has an on-the-nose history of publicly posing goals and going straight after them. No reason to suspect he’s not headed this way. There may be AI MacGuffins. t.co/RCwidrIZ1N
This Tweet is unavailable.
1
12
Replying to
although i wouldn’t want to be in his position, i wish more giant tech companies were in it burn your ships and it’s innovate or die at least he’s forced to TRY something instead of resting on your laurels which admittedly most have been doing
Show more replies