Genuinely curious to see how deep I get buried by the feed once the de-privileging of the nochecks (checkless? nonchecks? nunchuks?) begins
Lends new meaning to the term “sunk costs”
Conversation
I might actually have been willing if the thing had been thoughtfully and apolitically introduced as part of a monetization plan, but now the optics are execution are just so bad I think I must diminish, and go into the west
GIF
read image description
ALT
1
34
$96/y is a steal viewed as simply a premium marketing service since it’s flat regardless of followership. If you have 100 followers or a million, it’s the same price, but presumably reach scales linearly with followers (unless the algorithm has impression limits or throttling)
4
14
Not saying you should pay for it. Saying it should have been done for you a long time ago
1
Replying to
Why? Nobody has an incentive to impersonate me. I’m not a public official or org rep, and an obscure subcultural d-lister at best.
I really don’t get the point of it
Replying to
Don't sell yourself short. You are at the very least an obscure subcultural b-lister
1
1
Replying to
Literally now
Quote Tweet
The substack boys aren’t messing around in the medievalism wars.
I’m already a Duke on substack plebs. Didn’t even have to pay $8. Screw Wikipedia for deleting my page for lack of notability.
All hail co-emperors @hamishmckenzie and @cjgbest
Show this thread
1

