Conversation

Replying to and
I was thinking about Musk's Starlink and similar systems as another one of these. Russia seemingly can't jam it, and it's causing some actual political issues, but unsure how hard it would be to maintain long term. Imagine is they set this up over China...
1
Replying to
Why can no crypto person ever give a straight answer to the use case question? Doesn't seem that hard for anything else, which seems to imply it's a naive cult. I've not been surprised by anything thus far with crypto. Any link to a good explanation?
1
1
Replying to
Because it’s an unproductive question at this stage. Easier to just let history be the judge of whether or not it’s significant. Check back in a decade.
2
Replying to
What do you think a good question at this stage is? Any interesting answers? I'm not trying to be snarky. I've talked with a lot of major/OG crypto people, and they've never had good answers for me either, which is why I'm so skeptical.
1
1
Replying to and
You’re the very practical kind of entrepreneur :) I like things with no use case the best. So long as it thrives sustainably and creates interestingness I’m fine. I don’t care about legible utility or solving problems. There’s still no real use case for twitter.
1
2
Replying to
lol I know what zk proofs are. I just don't think they don't actually solve the thing they claim to solve. In my world "technically correct" is not the best kind of correct haha.
2
Replying to
You’re still thinking like a problem solver. I didn’t mention a particular problem. Just an open-ended technique. Let me flip it around. Why do you care at all? If you think there’s nothing there but speculation you can safely ignore it. Why don’t you?
Replying to
I think it's a combo of things: 1.) I'm offended at dumb bullshit that distracts talent/investors in the tech industry. 2.) It's almost an evil twin. I actually love computational finance, complex instruments, etc., so I hate that the closest thing seems to be run as a scam.
2
Replying to
There we have it. “Distracts talent/investors” is the same ”real problems” debate we’ve been having for a decade. You have a strong absolute sense of civilizational priorities and morality. You want collective resource allocation.
2
Show replies