Conversation

Ironic. Bloom is kinda the real period piece. There’s a kind of deep connoisseurship of refined media that’s perversely blind to cultural evolution on larger scales. Reminds me of Martin Scorsese on MCU.
Quote Tweet
HARRY POTTER (2000): "Not really children's literature, it's just slop...it's a period piece...in five or six years...they will be of interest to sociologists - the people who read them will not be able to remember what they read." Harold Bloom, Charlie Rose Show, July 11, 2000
Embedded video
1:32
26.9K views
9
30
I’ll admit I got bored to tears by one chapter of Anxiety of Influence and never bothered exploring his work further beyond his Wikipedia page. He seems to have been an energetic and prodigious reader and critic, but fundamentally compromised by a reactionary lack of imagination.
2
11
Replying to
I found this work of his to be extraordinarily imaginative
Quote Tweet
A while ago I was feeling a bit out and picked up Harold Bloom's "How to Read and Why" It happened to be the perfect remedy On its first page it offered its first of many reasons to read: Reading is "the most healing of pleasures"
Show this thread
Image
1
1