I think we like city states for the same reason we like toys. Especially adult ones like complex model railroads. It’s like full-scale sim city.
Conversation
Dammit. We’re stuck with these hulking big region size states
1
1
24
Also there are zero “hinterland states” with no cities. Those are even less stable. Only chocolate chip cookie topologies work.
5
1
36
If your near future sci-go has city states it’s actually fantasy
4
22
How can we 100x the number of city states? Which good cities are most suitable for forking into states?
11
5
33
I think the single biggest problem is water. If you invent really cheap desal, tons of coastal cities would be viable as states
11
4
51
Replying to
Worth noting that Singapore in fact joined Malaysia for a couple of years (1963-65) but was kicked out after refusing to pony up more revenues to KL. And the hinterlands point is exactly right: for decades there were big questions about how Singapore would get enough water.
1
4
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
There is plenty of water in California to support a large human population, just not enough to do that and water intensive agriculture in the Central Valley. Rationalizing water pricing would resolve this immediately.
1
2
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
The sudden movement on housing gives me a bit of hope. Water is much more fraught than housing though. I was involved in a Central Valley water thing 7-8 years back that convinced me it’s a 10x bigger issue than land NIMBYism/prop 13.
Politically even more fraught for sure but actually easier to address with the stroke of a pen. Just mandate market based pricing for water and urban California’s water problems disappear.
3

