It would be interesting to actually model the portfolio effect somehow. If you had 100 people with say n entrepreneurs, m social workers, p investigative journalists, q frontline first respondents, r soldiers, s homeless people etc, what does the net civ risk profile look like?
Conversation
It’s hard to think of a societal role, however apparently lowly, that *doesn’t* contribute to the net risk reward function. There are no true NPCs.
1
12
Even people who seem obviously beyond the pale, like people building uninsurable homes in floodplains/hurricane zones/fire boundaries and expecting bailouts post-disaster, are helping learn the global risk function. Though it’s admittedly hard to be sympathetic.
2
9
Do you know in what ways *you* are building on a flood plain? Is for eg. all of academia a flood plain? Is making art and expecting Patreon/NFT income that different from building in a hurricane zone and expecting FEMA bailout? Super easy to rationalize your thing as prosocial.
3
1
19
Replying to
You’re socializing the costs of your risk-taking. Taxpayer money vs patronage money is not that big a difference.
1
Something like that, esp on the trustie end. You might elevate our collective soul with some sublime art. Or you might just self-indulgently free-ride on others’ confused sentiments and loopholes in cronyist institutional grant programs, with a trust fund backstopping you.
surely there are some other options here 😂
on some level all creative work is a scam on paper - selling or receiving money for worthless things with the illusion of value due to surface qualities - but there are also whole industries dependent on continued creative production
1
Show replies


