Conversation

Replying to
As a blogger I basically write for whoever cares to read, and don't care to find out who they are for the most part unless they choose to tell me. As a newsetterer I do write for a "side" of some sort even though I don't know what it is
2
17
There is no such thing as a medium-independent message. If it's medium-independent it's data at best, and even that's a shaky claim. Blogs and newsletters are definitely *very* different for me.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
Definitely just "blogger", there's no functional difference for most of us and it's basically replacing the existing space
2
18
You may not see the differences as a reader, since I try to continue some of my old blog styles in my newsletters, but from the writing perspective there's a ton of differences in tone, rhetorical choices, audience relationships etc. Money is not the only factor.
3
11
One of the reasons I'm curious about this is that I have a gut-level clear sense of what blogging is, and I had that within like 2 years of starting. I haven't yet hit that medium-significance-fit insight with newsletters.
2
9
I'm looking for a theory of newsletters on par with my cozyweb theory of the web... kinda macro theory of the microbehaviors
2
5
Hmm. I think the sub-genre that actually aims at being captured by an audience rather than falling into capture unwittingly should be called pandercraft.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @jamescham and @vgr
audience capture is the result, but what is the intention? And what is the name of the work product(s) in realizing that intention?
Replying to
Ha! As a subscriber, I don’t think of the rest of the audience as a coherent “side” as much as others who are just interesting in seeing where you go with your explorations.
1
1
Show replies