There's enough competition in the space that that's not accurate, plus normatively I don't like validating monopolistic brand-capture of a medium. Especially email which is at least still a cosmetic commons despite capture by gmail etc.
Replying to
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
eh, substacker is probably right
it's a proprietary eponym, like how people user Kleenex instead of "tissue"
2
12


