Conversation

Replying to
Normally you don’t realize this because normally when not alone you’re usually with one of 2 groups (work, family/friends) with whom you have mutually constructed stable “individual” simulations OR strangers you only weakly entangle with due to social norms for impersonal conduct
1
16
BUT when you’re with groups where the entanglement potential is high but encounters are rare, like extended family, the “individual” simulation doesn’t have space to stabilize. The group-mind state is not familiar enough to your brain to carve out an individual mind from.
1
21
Replying to
Radical constructivists like Paul Watzlawick call it double-bind and Lacanians meconnaissance but either feel a bit tired and narrow in this day and age so I like murky multipolar group entanglement.
1