Human mutuality and entanglement are way undertheorized. Your accessible individual state is an illusion constructed out of a murky group-mind state.
Conversation
Replying to
Normally you don’t realize this because normally when not alone you’re usually with one of 2 groups (work, family/friends) with whom you have mutually constructed stable “individual” simulations OR strangers you only weakly entangle with due to social norms for impersonal conduct
1
16
BUT when you’re with groups where the entanglement potential is high but encounters are rare, like extended family, the “individual” simulation doesn’t have space to stabilize. The group-mind state is not familiar enough to your brain to carve out an individual mind from.
1
1
21
Aka I can’t get any work done hanging out with my parents, whom I now only see every few years. 🤣
2
1
19
From experience of that situation when they’ve visited me, yes but to a lesser extent. Something like a home-ground advantage in sports. twitter.com/0xTuti/status/
This Tweet is unavailable.
1
7
Replying to
Radical constructivists like Paul Watzlawick call it double-bind and Lacanians meconnaissance but either feel a bit tired and narrow in this day and age so I like murky multipolar group entanglement.
1

