Conversation

Replying to
Going back to OP, normie discourse is so fraught and culture-warry because most normies have zero interest in actual history and believe some genuinely motivated fantasy version of it. So it’s fiction-vs-fiction. A bit like being mad because LOTR isn’t consistent with Star Trek.
1
23
This thread and responses are a very non-normie way of talking about it, not because we’re any smarter or nobler but because genuine, non-identitarian curiosity about actual history (all history, not just your own) makes a difference in how you process history-inspired fiction
1
16
Remember, until very recently, the main purpose of historical scholarship was not to simply study and reconstruct the past but justify present behaviors. Lawyer historiography, not judge historiography.
1
12
Just struck me that while today, almost all transposition has been from European to non-European milieus, this was not the always the case. I was reading the Decameron a while back and some stories seemed suspiciously familiar… turns out they were imported from the Panchatantra
1
8
Narrative is a sensemaking technology for historical data. The specific bit of history where it was first used is really not that relevant. This matters beyond fiction, there’s a reason we’re analyzing US-China geopolitics in Thucydides trap terms.
1
6
It would be ludicrous to claim that replacing one variable in the Thucydides trap pattern with China is “wokification.” The intent is insight (eg: how is US different from Sparta, and China different from Athens?), not representation.
1
7
When representation is the only motive the sensemaking aspect of the pattern has no traction. This doesn’t affect SpecFic as much. To the extent Foundation is a Rome —> Trantor transposition, the Trantor end is a free variable. You could do the whole thing with Chinese actors.
1
6
By contrast earliest Asimov robot books are strongly set in 20th century USA. Harder to transpose. The later robot books (Lije Bailey) set 1000 years from now arguably would *not* work on screen without transposition. Extrapolating 1950s US would look like Jetsons caricature.
1
8
I think you can compute the represented/representing/spectator 3-way-milieu fit in a systematic way to predict if it will work. It’s a function of how each of the 3 milieus models the other two. SpecFic can reduce this to 2 if it is far out enough the represented is unreal.
1
4
Critically, I think a good rule is: the representing milieu (the cast as a whole) can’t have an obvious political interest in a hostile subversion of the spectator milieu’s political interest in the represented milieu.
Replying to
I think a related thing pisses off right-wing malcontents the most: these DEIversified shows are not made for them at all but they think they’re the rightful audiences. But otoh they can’t make such lavish shows for themselves.
2
9
The money paying for this show came from a huge retailer with an extremely diverse workforce that sources almost everything it sells from Asia. I’m trying to imagine… is there an extremely end-to-end white business rich enough to bankroll such a production 🤔
2
8
I suspect this has a subtle effect. Increasingly the end credits of any big production look like a vast sample of global media production capabilities. It is typically way more diverse than the on-screen cast. Half the CGI and FX seems to come from Asia.
1
5
This vast global machine is primarily making shows and movies for itself. Not for any small homogeneous group that might have a stake in the historical source materials. They’re just not rich enough to be worth the trouble.
2
5
Chauvinism is a scale-limiting factor if you want to tell expensive stories. That’s why Hallmark channel content isn’t lavishly produced. It’s all small town cheap stories. No dragons or spaceships. But this could change!
1
4
Once AI makes things cheap enough, you could make your own version of any story. The Rings of Power is half a billion today but could perhaps be made for half a million with generative AI in a decade. Then even Truth Social could make one. And stiff the AIaaS supplier of course.
2
9
Discussion of full retelling belongs in here somewhere. Where you go past straight transpositions with cosmetic changes to full retellings. A good example is Legend of Bagger Vance. If someone hadn’t pointed it out I might not even have noticed the Bhagavad Gita deep transpose.
1
5
Another one is Firefly. The show was kinda ruined for me once it was pointed out that it was basically post civil war confederate reputation laundering. Couldn’t unsee that once I saw it.
2
12
This one is a good example of history fragility. It’s a solid and entertaining show in other ways, but can’t survive awareness of some context. Once you connect the dots to the civil war, it feels unsatisfying.
4