Conversation

Replying to
I think recent eras are: 1964-1979: long 60s 1980-1993: long 80s 1994-2007: long 90s 2008-2021: long Weirding 2022-2033: long 20s Enough time has passed that long 80s, long 90s feel like “history” to me now. Don’t remember long 60s since I was only 5 when it ended.
9
53
Replying to
to be fair I was 12 When it happens so maybe I don't see the connection. Is there not the end of history / liberal democracy triumphant meme through the '90s that falls apart with the beginning of terror and war on terror?
1
4
Replying to
That’s the thing… it doesn’t. It’s literally a straight line from earlier wtc bombing, 1993. It was not a black swan. The on-continent nature of the attack, and the tactical innovation (box cutters on airliners) was shocking to American citizens but the conflict itself was not
1
4
Replying to and
The clash-of-civilizations thesis from Huntington was always the Yang to the Yin of EoH, but not actually influential. Fukuyama was his student, and in with the post-9/11 neocons and more directly influential. WoT was viewed as EoH endgame, not CoC opening.
1
5
Replying to and
There was a reason it was so easy for the neocons to bullshit the WoT into the Iraq War and connect it to the unfinished 1991 first gulf war agenda. It was all neatly wrapped up in EoH foreign policy. 9/11 just provided a particularly solid casus belli.
1
4
Replying to and
This continues today. Militant Islam is not taken seriously on its own terms as a civilization with an agenda the way China is. The Islamic theater is largely a Cold War unfinished mop-up while oil still matters. The “world caliphate” is not a serious contender in futures.
1
4
Replying to
A clear tell of uninterrupted EoH neocon logic was the "axis of evil" speech conflating 3 very different threats whose only common factor was seriously armed and being anti-liberal democracy: North Korea, Iran, Iraq. Juche communism, Shia eschatology, and Sunni world domination
1
2