"Architecture" is not quite it though. There's a full-stack, end-to-end quality to the thinking that architects of any sort typically lack. Talented architects are good at laying out strategic contours and key tactical details. But not heavy lifts like this.
Conversation
Like Tolkien himself would count as an excellent architect. But he worked primarily in a single strategic medium, the text. Closer to mathematics than epic cinema. On balance, I'd say making the films was a greater achievement than writing the books.
2
24
Speaking of Tolkien, I recall an interview where he said he was often asked why the eagles couldn't just drop the ringbearer into mordor, and he said his response was "oh... shut up!" (good humoredly). Elegant architecture can get away with logic fails in a way movies can't.
3
21
I wonder what the most full-spectrum complex thing humans do that is driven by a single individual. I think it's a three-way dead heat between bleeding edge space missions, complex movies, and computer hardware (bottom half of stack from silicon to low-level system software)
4
3
17
Replying to
Too low-dimensional imo. The presence of a clear win condition under defined rules makes it a finite game vulnerable to Goodhart law impoverishment and no reason to rise to sublime. It closer to “IPO a unicorn company” I’d say. My other examples are infinite games.
1
2
The worst movies, space missions, and political campaigns have a lot in common, but the best of the first two reach heights political campaigns never do. Perhaps political lawmaking might qualify. Like getting ACA passed.
1
4
Replying to
If that’s the standard, then “decolonization + nation-building” must be in this category, at least potentially. Think Ataturk, Nyerere, Sukarno, Nkrumah, Nehru, etc.
1
6
Replying to
What distinguishes modern variety from old empire building? Trying to detect a strand of historically increasing complexity. Could you say that complexity increase from Alexander to Ataturk is comparable to Galileo telescope to JWST? Or Aeschylus play to Peter Jackson movie?
2
3
Replying to
Building an integrated bureaucratic state cum ideological-media apparatus is certainly an exceedingly complex endeavor — and an infinite game. I’m not sure how the analogy to telescopes could be made useful.
1
1
6
Replying to
I’d say a bleeding edge telescope can be understood as the most advanced integration of all available technologies and sciences of an era into a single general sensory capability.
The politics machine similarly is the most advanced integration of social science and technologies?
Movies are interesting since they operate in a bridge zone between social and material technologies
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
I agree with both sides of that, I’m just not sure how (useful it is) to map them onto one another.
1
3
Replying to
See deeper into the void at the birth of the universe =
See deeper into the void at the core of humanity
Image the Sagittarius B central black hole =
Have Trump rule for 4 years 🤣
1
2
Show replies

