Conversation

Replying to and
Not that I’d want to defend Ezra Klein, but “there’s an entire field of study” has always seemed to me to be a dumb whine. I mean if I write a future speculations article, astrologers could make that complaint. The value of a field must be demonstrated, not just asserted.
1
9
Replying to and
I don’t care if a thousand idiots in a captured academic field of mutual congratulation are writing journal articles at each other using a self-important internal lingo. If you can’t demonstrate your relevance in *public* terms of reference you deserve to be ignored.
1
6
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Replying to and
Not just accessible but relevant. Engineering has a natural advantage in that tech produces artifacts you can use whether or not you understand how they work. I don’t need you to study navier stokes equations before complaining about airlines. The airplane itself is “relevance”
1
7
I definitely have a soft spot for semi-outsider types who pwn a discourse claimed by an academic field... like Christopher Alexander and Buckminster Fuller in architecture :D I think it's a key check and balance to fields achieving regulatory capture on public-interest domains
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I don't think they have. I believe the policing impulse comes from a desire for it. Goes from "somebody is wrong on the internet" to "my friends and I know The Truth and should be deferred to" Which is dangerous and why I resist even if it means Ezrakleinfication of discourses
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more