Conversation

Replying to
Heh I’ve been explicitly labeling a bunch of my time study too lately. Weird how hard it is to study as an adult. It’s perceived as frivolity on par with play. It becomes indistinguishable from its childhood opposite.
3
22
Replying to and
“This is serious, we don’t have time to study, we have work to do.” Where used it’s in a different adult professional analysis sense of “study this proposal” not general topic mastery
9
Replying to
That child/adult flip on the term is so stark. I started thinking about how as a kid, I'd describe a lot of my unstructured play as studying. So maybe that need to spend some time figuring out is just a long arc.
2
7
Replying to
I didn’t study much, but when I did get into a subject I’d study it far beyond the needs of school syllabus, if it was on syllabus at all. So I had a weird rep as the kid who breezed through school work unlike the conscientious but not bright ones who were considered “studious”
1
3
Replying to
Interested in almost everything including fortunately almost all school subjects. Outside of syllabus, astronomy, airplanes, world history got to study level. To some extent if I found a good self-study book on any subject I’d study it. Study books are rare, unlike textbooks.
2
6
Replying to and
Like for world history, the nerdsnipe feature was pictures. I studied this through 8th grade in 1988 for eg, filling a 1 inch notebook including my own copied illustrations. I studied it far more seriously than syllabus history
2
2
Replying to
Hehe I’ve since read more advanced history books of course but this is still my bedrock knowledge layer 😆 Another was a photo-rich book called great events of the 20th century. Might have been this one.
1
1
Replying to
I think history books with pictures strike a uniquely good balance between TV/YouTube shallowness and dry text that can make you lose sight of people in history being real. These 2 had maps, drawings, photos of monuments, photos of real events for 20th century…