Conversation

Bullshit in this epistemological sense is not a moral failure, but an incomplete cognition mode. It corresponds to the upstream part of what Daniel Dennett called the "multiple drafts" view of consciousness. First you confabulate, then you discriminate.
1
20
Ie the bullshit is necessary but not sufficient. You free-associate to produce output that has a cosmetic coherence, and then close the truth loop somehow in a downstream discrimination step before actual output. Bullshitters output intermediate output indiscriminately basically.
3
18
Replying to and
Note that this is the opposite of autism. Autists let even minor sensory errors propagate to consciousness as a discordance, like the scratch of a tag on your shirt or noise from multiple conversations. Wambs, on the other hand, suppress all discordance pre-consciously.
2
3