Zooming out to extreme macro, the growth vs. degrowth may be ill-posed. What if step-by-step is the DNA of tortoise like growth that doesn't backslide or crash as much? What if net, the tortoise IS faster than the hare?
Conversation
Hmm... now that I think of it, my "sparring partner" approach is a step-by-step alternative to trying to "do" one-shot strategy. Instead of a fully-formed strategy being designed out of 2 days of leadership retreat BS, it emerges gradually, contour by contour
3
7
In any single sparring conversation, you might take 1-2 steps at most, but they add up over time. The strategy "takes shape" at the rate of actual alpha being uncovered in the situation, like a thing gradually revealing its full structure.
1
8
I'm unhappy with the term stepbystepism. I need to know the True Name of this thing.
Possibly asynchronous sequentialism, as an antidote to the growing synchronous parallelism of the last few decades.
12
1
6
Prompt thread of examples
Quote Tweet
What’s a thing you do mindfully “step by step” very often?
Eg: making pour-over coffee
6
4
Oh shot just figured out the True Name of this thing. It’s not step-by-step, it’s loop-by-loop! Or better still, loopchaining.
You don’t move to the next loop until current loop gets to 99.9% and you retest all atomic and subchain loops each time you extend the loopchain.
2
1
12
This is easily NP complete. To add loop n+1, you have to requalify minimum n loops again and max 2^n loops. If you don’t have nonlinear payoffs and/or “loop fusion” where substrings chunk-up somehow, it’s an intractable way to learn.
1
3
Worse. Each loop is an OODA loop, and the chain only works when the orientations are aligned. Which means potentially n^2 or higher misalignment modes. And this is under non-adversarial supervision.
3
1
Replying to
You have to keep trying a step till you can get it right 99% of the time before moving on to the adding the next step


