Conversation

Replying to
Hmm... now that I think of it, my "sparring partner" approach is a step-by-step alternative to trying to "do" one-shot strategy. Instead of a fully-formed strategy being designed out of 2 days of leadership retreat BS, it emerges gradually, contour by contour
3
7
In any single sparring conversation, you might take 1-2 steps at most, but they add up over time. The strategy "takes shape" at the rate of actual alpha being uncovered in the situation, like a thing gradually revealing its full structure.
1
8
I'm unhappy with the term stepbystepism. I need to know the True Name of this thing. Possibly asynchronous sequentialism, as an antidote to the growing synchronous parallelism of the last few decades.
12
6
Oh shot just figured out the True Name of this thing. Itโ€™s not step-by-step, itโ€™s loop-by-loop! Or better still, loopchaining. You donโ€™t move to the next loop until current loop gets to 99.9% and you retest all atomic and subchain loops each time you extend the loopchain.
2
12
This is easily NP complete. To add loop n+1, you have to requalify minimum n loops again and max 2^n loops. If you donโ€™t have nonlinear payoffs and/or โ€œloop fusionโ€ where substrings chunk-up somehow, itโ€™s an intractable way to learn.
1
3
Worse. Each loop is an OODA loop, and the chain only works when the orientations are aligned. Which means potentially n^2 or higher misalignment modes. And this is under non-adversarial supervision.
3
1
Replying to
At my peak as an improv teacher, I absolutely felt like I could prescribe combinations of warmups to address a variety of performance goals, culminating in spontaneous musical narratives. Atomic skills included rhyming single syllables, yes and, raising stakes, gradually combine,
1
3