I think I tend to devalue the human because a) this species seems unduly impressed with itself and b) I’m a fairly typical one myself and I have the inside scoop on what we’re really like
But objectively, Homo sapiens is genuinely interesting. Better than lunar eclipses for eg.
Conversation
Kidding aside, I think a big reason “humans” rank lower on the interestingness scale than they should is that almost all of our models of “human” are adversarially constructed. One group reductively modeling another in a reductive, impoverished ways.
1
1
20
Models of rich people are made by resentful middle class people
Models of the poor are made by contemptuous rich people
Models of middle-class people are made by populist demagogues
Blacks by whites, whites by blacks, Europeans and Asians by each other
A bunch of caricatures
5
5
24
If a biologist modeled, say, dolphins or redwood trees with this much epistemically destructive motivated bias, they’d be fired
1
19
Popping out of our own species head and modeling humans as (for eg) Martians might, is really hard. Desmond Morris made a brave attempt with his two 70s pop books, Naked Ape and Human Zoo. Flawed but interesting. I liked Oliver Sacks’ old books too.
Replying to
It's only fair that we hire an alien biographer for homo sapiens.
If we can't find a true extra-terrestrial, then an AI-enhanced terrestrial species (dolphins, mice, chimps, etc.) can be humanity's ethnographer.
"Judge of the Change" seems an appropriate title.

