Conversation

Venkat, long time (since BrSmrt Season 1!) reader, first time caller. I offer you the rare “no, and” here — at the strategic level. Most people misunderstand what most 3-letter agencies do. Cybersecurity especially. I used to coordinate it all (fr), happy to explain further.
1
4
This is a long discussion and I wouldn’t want to presume I understand the totality of what Renee told you, which we may not disagree on. I would just offer that the remit of those agencies doesn’t overlap with broadly understood, broadly executed “decensive cyber operations”
1
3
Let’s talk through an example - a short story, if you will - of a cyber-scenario you think would enjoy state intervention. I can provide you some insight here as to how it would actually play out. My gut tells me the problem space is even bigger than you likely think it is.
2
1
Show replies
It is also increasingly murky what constitutes an asset that deserves/enjoys state protection. It is obvious the state should protect a factory from being bombed. It's less obvious that Facebook's global network is any one country's responsibility based merely on domicile
5