Conversation

Replying to
In both cases the mere hostility of a party with power is taken to be a proxy for truth. The heuristic is good for personally threatening news about stuff like corruption or crime. For matters of general factfulness, it’s basically noise.
1
9
Replying to
I don’t think I’ve heard this line in decades But now that so many “journalists” seem to be third-generation-wealthy failsons and faildaughters and are themselves paragons of comfort, wonder whose job it is to afflict them 🤔
4
Replying to
why am i seeing such a weird subtext in this? i’m reading: “news is only of value if there is divisive content in there that will trigger strong emotions (regardless of accuracy), otherwise it’s just a fluff piece”
Show more replies