Conversation

Rereading the Asimov Lije Bailey books after a while. Catching interesting worldbuilding details I missed before. Like this idea that sets up the distant post-Foundation future of Solaria. They eugenicize sociability out of themselves.
Image
6
68
Caves of Steel (1953) and Naked Sun (1956) are technically vastly better than the 3 empire novels (1950-52). Remarkable to see his rapid evolution as a novelist but more importantly as a world builder.
Quote Tweet
Rereading Pebble in the Sky. Not a great book but it has a certain uniquely poignant feel to it, by virtue of being approximately the middle book of Asimoverse. The robot past and Foundation future are equally distant in time, and the story has a certain expansive solitude to it.
Show this thread
1
19
The thing I’m picking up on in this 3rd read through of Asimov, where I’m trying to follow his evolution as a writer rather than in-universe chronology, is that he was always unconsciously planting seeds for the future extended universe. That’s why it hands together so well.
2
19
Here for instance is the seed of the Zeroth Law that R. Daneel formulates later in the 1985 book Robots and Empire which in turn is the retconned basis for psychohistory
Image
1
18
But already in The Naked Sun, the basic idea of psychohistory is already there, where Bailey argues with a crackpot Solarian sociologist, Quemont, about quantified sociology laws. Quemont is an anti-Seldon.
Image
Image
3
13
I’m not saying Asimov planned all this, but he had an instinct for sowing seeds that he could reap harvests from later. People who think Asimoverse is a lazy set of retcons are basically wrong. This was destined to come together as an extended universe.
3
26
And *nobody* was doing this sort of thing back then in 1940-55. I’m going to argue Asimov invented the extended universe, with full speculative world building. And he could because he was building off contemporary science trends. So he inherited narrative harmonies to exploit.
3
32
Unlike Sherlock Holmes universe he didn’t just coopt actual reality. Unlike Jules Verne it wasn’t isolated crossovers like Nemo showing up in 2 books.
1
8
Asimov is underrated today because his approach has been endlessly critically subverted by everyone from Herbert and PKD to modern writers. But he developed the OG form. Stream of consciousness improv metaverse building across books.
Replying to
Serious respect. I first read all of Asimov as a teenager in the 80s. Then I reread in 2016 but not closely. Now I’m kinda close-reading, and am impressed. His literary ability improves from crappy to decent over 50 years but he was never a prose stylist. But world building… wow
1
22
Arguably Asimoverse is a superior achievement than Middle Earth. Bones of multiple real histories, flesh of multiple speculative science trends, efficient but not overwrought skin of plot and character, real imagination in grand arc.
2
23
In many respects he has never been topped and more recent works regress to the more primitive forms that existed before him. Like Guardians of the Galaxy is Flash Gordon grade. Fun but not exactly complex or deep.
1
13
Actually I got it backwards. Foundation was written as short stories in 1951 so psychohistory was already a defined idea in-universe 5 years before Naked Sun. So the unconscious connection weaving went the other way, backwards in-universe shaping the robot murders.
3
10
Now into The Robots of Dawn. Struck by weird predictive misfires in Asimov. The main futuristic storage medium is still film. They have “book film viewers.” They have phone booths even as late as The Stars, Like Dust. What made wireless+digital tech so hard to see in 1950?
3
9
In Naked Sun, cryofreezing of eggs and sperm is not anticipated but ex-utero fetal development exists, so the premises of the society are weirdly screwed up.
1
5
Somehow the internet was a major blindside for people. It is implied that the robots have radio communication on Solaria and there’s a sort of VR telepresence but nothing like a proper internet. Computers are accessed like libraries.
2
13
Vannevar Bush envisioned the Memex (on microfilm) back in 1945 but it was still too hard to imagine how computers, digitization, and radio would converge. The comms imagined all sounds like analog radio. Including “sub-ether” futuristic hyper spatial comms.
1
10
First proper minicomputer in 1961, first internet link in 1969, but first true science fiction envisioning the internet only in 1984, with neuromancer, 15 years after it was created in rudimentary form. Why the huge lag? What caused the blinders?
10
16
Robots of Dawn is as thick as Caves of Steel and Naked Sun combined. I have a 3-in-1 volume. And iirc Robots and Empire is even bigger. World inflation.
Image
1
5
Same with Harry Potter. Is it a general rule that big world builds have increasing volume sizes? Though Asimoverse has 4 start points.
3
3
How did I miss that Dr. Hans Fastolfe, inventor of Daneel, also dreamed of psychohistory? Giskard and Daneel got the idea from him I guess, and Daneel kept it alive till he met Sheldon.
Image
2
9
Finished. This reread was interesting. Written in 1983 this was 25 years after Naked Sun in 1957. The last 2 robot books and the last 4 foundation books were all written in the 80s and 90s. So Asimoverse was written in the 59s and 80s. What was he doing in the 60s and 70s? 🤔
1
2
So basically a furiously productive phase from 1939 to 1957 (ages 19 to 37), then a really long 25y sabbatical into nonfiction till ~1982 (ages 37 to 62), then a mature late life burst age 62-72 wrapping up his peak work neatly in a bundle with 6 keystone novels.
2
8
Robots of Dawn is not great. Lots of kinda unnecessary sex-fetish stuff. Too much exposition. And looking now from a technique perspective, R. Giskard is a bit of a deus ex machina. He ties up every loose end in Asimoverse and is way too powerful. More so than Daneel.
4
6
Still, it’s elegantly done and Giskard is a well-crafted character. Despite being basically the closest thing to a god in Asimoverse, he’s kinda interesting. On to reread of Robots and Empire, the main keystone book.
2
5
The cover of robots and empire, 1986, is kinda silly. But definitely very 80s. AFAIK the robots depicted have no relationship with the story.
Image
3
9
Didn’t pick up on this in previous read, but this book repeatedly emphasizes Baley’s uncanny future prediction instincts that weren’t mentioned in previous books. I think Asimov was kinda retconning protopsychic second foundation genes into Baley. I bet he’s Raych’s ancestor.
Image
Image
1
3
This is a character continuity glitch. In previous books. Baley is a bit of a present focused type. He picks up distant future arguments from others.
1
2
Much of Robots and Empire is Daneel and Giskard standing around bearing witness to unfolding history. A great parody version would be something like mystery science theater with only robots
1
5
Some of this connective is a bit too on the nose. Giskard infers basic premises of psychohistory watching Gladia whip up a crowd on Baleyworld and concludes emotional contagion makes bigger crowds easier to control than smaller ones or individuals. Talk of autocatalytic effects.
1
2
There’s some clear influence of 80s chaos theory in Asimov’s last books. Quite explicit in the Foundation preludes. Late retcon as opposed to 80s authors who used stuff like Prigognine’s physics as a starting point.
1
4
The Ljje-Daneel bromance is really overdone in this book. Very heavy handed. I’d forgotten the deathbed scene, but this book really sets Lije Bailey up as the of prophet of psychohistory. Like Moses to Seldon’s Jesus or something.
1
3
The plot of Robots and Empire involves the three mile island disaster as the trigger for Earth’s turn away from fission power. It was written in 1985, 6 years after the accident and a year before Chernobyl.
1
6
If the book had been published just a little later, Chernobyl would have made way more sense as the historical reference point. Funny how such plot choices date a book and the future it imagines.
1
6
Show replies