This is a common conceit — that atheism is some sort of naive, sophomore teen rebellion that one reconsiders and abandons with maturity as a part of adulting. That anyone still professing atheism past 25 is to be pitied for failing to grow up 🤣
Conversation
This stereotype is in fact correct as a description of the median 19-year-old atheist who has recently read Blind Watchmaker or something by Dennett, but in my experience as you examine older cohorts, the contempt flows the other way, like atheists are frozen at 19.
2
13
For the record, I’ve been atheist since I first thought to even reflect on the question at maybe 8, and was not the sophomore-logic-bomb type even at 19. It’s been pretty consistently a sort of Discordian, Douglas-Adamish absurdist strain. This tends to be the lifelong strain.
3
16
The logic-bomb type is typically a fragile atheist and likely to “turn” if bitten by a theist on a full-moon because logical denialism is a kind of effort to resist a temptation to belief. The absurdists are a different breed, fundamentally lacking the underlying temptation.
1
1
16
I wouldn’t be surprised if this turned out to be a somewhat genetic predisposition, a bit like alcoholism, especially under modern conditions, where required social performances are not a major factor.
2
9
Anyhow, I think the biggest change I’m seeing in myself as an aging atheist is that I’m much less inclined to empathize with the religious mind. Not getting intolerant necessarily, but definitely holding the religious responsible for the consequences of religiosity.
2
22
This thread is a prequel to me going full Dawkins in 2025 🤬
2
14
Replying to
As someone who loves your "sankhyan" thought process (you may want to call it atheism, I don't care), I wonder if you've spent time checking out Sankhya philosophy. As I experience life, theism-atheism is a false binary that seems to have no validity.
1



