While characteristics of the work itself (statistical signatures, measures of composability and chemistry) can provide some sort of valuation of the generative potential.
Conversation
And of course, the strongest signal is just the buy-in levels of funding themselves. If a set of graphic assets raises $50m worth of ether, there's a good chance the artist will want to double down and do something with that windfall, like make a game or movie or whatever.
1
7
An NFT is (or can be positioned as) something like an unsecured restricted income share agreement (or general value share) anchored on an asset+person. Unlike a generic ISA, it points only to the value induced by “seed” objects
2
12
In fact you could just “NFT yourself” as a simple ISA-like thing. Name a coin after yourself. Done. Null nft with all alpha linked to the minter.
3
1
10
I’m now rethinking ERC-20s based on NFTs. Are there good/reliable no-code ways to generate them? I found this for example.
8
2
14
Been on the lookout for Web3 climate action models. This is the only one I’ve seen so far.
5
1
20
Sidebar elsewhere on the practical matter of planning for the inevitable crash. I’m not a big believer in predictions, but it’s interesting to lay out the worst case scenario that would still keep you interested. Will you keep tinkering if ether is at $400 for 2y? $200 for 5y?
Quote Tweet
here we go again twitter.com/latimes/status…
Show this thread
2
6
Not ether specifically, but as indicator of crypto overall. If analogies to 2000 are justified, then a 90%+ crash for 5+ y might be what you plan around as worst case. Can you keep tinkering with NFTs, DAOs etc through such a winter? I frankly don’t know my lower limit.
3
9

