Conversation

Replying to
This is why the split is the hyperlink of Web3. It forks a flow structurally. Voting and staking mechanisms look like flows > stocks. Multisig wallets are flow control valves. “Balances” (not coins) are levels of fungible stocks in flow buffers. Burning tokens is flow.
3
31
Minting is an unfortunate coin-metaphor term (“coinage” 😖). It’s really a kind of source spigot. I wish they’d called mining drilling. Drilling for hashes.
4
20
Ethereum developed better language tbh. Ether, gas… fluid metaphors all over the place. Oh yeah, hash rates! Can’t get more flow than that! And mining “pool” … you can’t really pool solids.
1
29
Okay will hit pause on this train of thought. Trying hard to stay on the hands-on side. It would be just too easy for me to get carried away by this flow 🤣 My natural mode is tinker with real things for 5 minutes, speculate wildly in the abstract for 15. Must resist.
1
26
Replying to
It’s interesting to me that you’re so fixated on splits. You’re not wrong, I just haven’t seen smart contracts for automatically splitting between N people besides Foundation. It would be cool to create a protocol for revenue splits on payments for an eCommerce type site
1
2
have an older version live on ropsten, hoping to be live on main net by end of month (adding erc20 support and mutable splits). Discord just starting up but if you want to chat about v2 we have some interesting ideas for what comes next
1
1
sg, no rush — afaict we’re thinking about this similarly: splits as a primitive social wallets. Lots of building to do on my end in the meantime 🤓
Quote Tweet
Prediction: MetaMask will add a messaging function. You already have an address book. You’re probably doing splits with them. Why go to Signal or wherever? Mutisigs will develop attached group discussion fora. Messaging companies may acquire wallet companies. Or vice versa.
Show this thread
3