Conversation

Replying to
You’ll see a lot of professional writing advice about “laying pipe” that’s like the grinder part. I’m sure they’re right for the pro stuff. But for me, where possible, I’d rather say, “this happened and then 2 miles of pipe yada yada later that happened.”
2
Solving strictly for having fun produces texts that don’t always look like proper stories but are fun to write and read. I’m fine with that. I think when I go get the confidence to post more publicly a lot of it will be kinda not stories at all.
1
2
As an extremely verbal person but a really mediocre artist, I actually found my storytelling was stronger if I let visuals serve as the load-bearing part. My writing experience was getting in the way of story.
1
1
In general I’ve decided: if the choice is between having fun vs checking off items on a checklist about what counts as a real story, I’m going with fun. Ie just don’t do the non-fun part unless the thing unravels into incoherence without it. Yada yada past it.
2
1
If the result is a coherent not-quite-story, that’s good enough for me. I’m not looking to win nobels or movie deals here. I doubt any fiction I write will be as successful as my nonfiction. So do what’s fun, worry about what it is later.
1
Feels like all forms of story are Industrial Age anyway. Maybe stuff I manage to write will be narrative fragment nfts to put into metaverses.
1
1
Maybe I can call these things — the 4 examples I linked are the 2021 crop so far — something else. Storycules? Like molecules. Set expectations low enough that I can produce more. Targeting 8-10 storycules for 2022. Maybe 1 more this year 😎
Replying to
I guess I’ve learned what I don’t like: languid, luxuriant prose, richly textured descriptions, subtle details… photorealistic stuff. I think I like stick-figure storytelling. Get as close to a 3-panel comic strip as possible. Say what needs saying or is fun to say. Cut the rest
1
5