For those like me interested in a technological surrender option, a new Promethean force comparable to Moore’s Law, crypto, ML, and solar have been the 3 big candidates, all “children of silicon.” None as powerful as the parent.
Lithium is another, but weaker than oil
Conversation
Importantly, surrender options are not ideas unless they are literal religions. They need a material basis. Arguably Reaganism had a material basis first in globalized trade, then in silicon. Americanism as a 150y old region is rooted in oil.
1
1
The US was the OG petrostate for ~20-30y. The only reason it didn’t succumb to the Dutch disease/curse of resources is, it was first so had to invent the oil industry and all the tech. The hard work stayed the curse which descended on later petrostates.
2
1
2
Aside, curse of resources is a degenerate surrender religion. Saudi Arabia’s first religion, ahead of Islam.
1
1
So inventing even the finest new secular -ism won’t help solve the meaning crisis. You need to claim either god or physics on your side. A bunch of philosophy or manifestos won’t do.
God is dead, so it’s either reactionary delusions or new physics.
1
1
4
Surrender to technological serendipity is what we usually call a network effect. An unbounded nonlinear upside dynamic hay is unreasonably easy to trigger within a broader physics rising tide (oil, silicon).
2
1
4
This is a satisfying theory and explains why charismatic cult leader types only ever attract a minority of idiot true believers under post-modern conditions. The axial age is long over. Simply claiming revelation and delivering messianic texts is just campy to most people.
1
4
Relatedly modern cults are NOT precursors of trad religions of 3021. Conditions have changed. The pristine ground of unicameral minds was only available for colonization that one time. It was the first and last “human resource” fossil fuel. New religions can’t evolve that way.
3
9
If I had to bet, I’d bet on machine learning as the new physics force that can drive a new surrender-based religiosity. Just surrender to the inscrutable algorithm. If Moore’s Law is OT Judaism, ML is NT Christianity. Already with eastern (Chinese) and Western branches.
6
1
9
Replying to
Think you’re dead wrong. Surrender is detachment in divine clothing. You’re disconnecting from earthly desires so you can obey the divine instructions. It’s really just tuning into embodied combination, and personal values, coupled with external rules. Could be secularised…
2
Replying to
How does that detachment contradict my characterization of surrender? Or do you mean I’m wrong about ML?
Replying to
The dead wrong was about ML and the need for a tech component. If enough people made ‘creativity’ their god, that’d still work.
Viewing detachment as surrender just means that Buddhism, Stoicism and almost all spiritual practices have a surrender component.
1
Show replies
Replying to
Humans want to surrender. It is good for us. We want to be a tiny speck in a huge crowd, or a small part of a powerful mob. It also gets us out of the shock trap. The eternal ‘I’ as the centre of the universe.
We also want to be God. To connect with the power of the divine.
1

