Conversation

This is a strange description. "public servants, students, activists, and leaders" So, regular adult citizens are...the bulk of the actual 'public' are part of the problem to be solved by the 4 addressed constituencies?
Image
3
7
Replying to
We make choices of what services to use, where to live, what incentives to respond to, which cues to follow/ignore, take people seriously or make fun of them etc. We may be low-energy but we are not passives. We are active agents beyond voting. In aggregate the most important
1
3
Replying to and
I think the four categories of people are basically way too self-important and over-rate their degree of influence on public affairs and the extent to which problems are theirs to solve
1
1
Replying to
The point of this book, and ones like it, is to help those people be more effective. I'm sure a big part of it is how to engage with the general public, etc. Otherwise, you'd want a "US Citizenship, on Owner's Manual" kind of book which would be really different.
2
Replying to
I'm not generally on the side of these 4 groups, and usually default to assuming they're wrong about whatever they're on about and trying to do the wrong things, so I'm fine if they're ineffective 😂
1
1
Replying to
Yea, I'm pretty friendly to markets, but you can wag the dog to a certain extent with them, and the market can lead the herd off the cliff, which we can't have in a country.
1
Show replies