All influence clearly rests on the things you don’t say 🤔
But if you say everything OR you say nothing you have no influence, so there’s logically a Ballmer peak type thing in there 🧐
Conversation
Ballmer peak as in the claim that you’re most productive at the right amount of drunk
It’s narrow, situational, and dynamic too, so a sort of fragile wandering peak xkcd.com/323/
1
1
6
Replying to
The same seems to apply under the right amount of sleep deprivation. A pattern here?
1
2
Replying to
Yerkes-Dodson law is the formal version… arousal/performance correlation
I guess sleep deprivation dies have that zone
Replying to
Thank you for the reference (new to me).
It does not look to represent well the say everthing/nothing to influence space, except as analogy. Mere correlation, or deeper connection with arousal/performance?
when we do complex tasks, each component of the task may have a separate peak. can you optimize for multiple? or do some sort of dynamic tracking?


