Curious: I often hear illegibility associated to the post-rat community. What are the canonical refs? I'm asking specifically for canonical within the post-rat community, not the much broader literature.
Maybe:
Conversation
Replying to
it would hardly be appropriate if it were a legible source instead of just like, something that people think and talk about
6
1
61
*ahem* didn’t you have this legible fatwa against legibility pinned to your profile for a while caliph?
Quote Tweet
sorry but if sincerely defending your beliefs is clearly and easily distinguishable from trolling then your beliefs are basic
1
15
In my experience banana tends to post first and decide whether or not she’s trolling later if and when an observer asks. Cunning kind of plausible deniability to not even know in advance.
Reminds me of John Wheeler's game of negative 20 questions (you keep changing the answer, to be consistent with all the answers given to date, as an allegory of quantum theory...)
1
10



