Conversation

Moving documentation for new users out of a Roam graph and on onto the website would help very much. I think this is all just natural part of a natural trajectory for a company that had so much buzz and growth early on. “What got us here won’t get us there” takes time to see
1
1
Early success means that marketing wasn’t needed. A passionate community emerged and didn’t require the type of proactive fostering and maintenance you’re talking about. Some have said Obsidian does more to foster community - of course they’d have to, they are up against Roam
1
2
But communication style and personality hasn’t changed - that’s actually the problem. It’s still quirky and nerdy and exciting. But people’s perception of this communication style has changed. Or they grew more and more dislike for it over time (you can’t please everyone)
1
1
This was called out by months ago. I immediately thought of this tweet when I read Curzi’s post.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @Conaw @gerad_t0d and 3 others
I'm suggesting you take a hard look at the consequences of the apparently cosmetic choice to use such language and mental models. Who does it attract? Who does it turn off. What doors open? What doors close? In case it's not clear, it personally turns me off quite strongly.
1
Building a business and product is the art of juggling priorities & resources. Hard stuff. It seems an over reaction to for people to say things like “the fall of Roam” when, in fact, this is the type of learning experience that will make a company stronger long-term
1
1
Good stuff for and gang to reflect on. I’ve not really laid attention to all this, but still been using as before. My key product concerns (loading time, permissions, API, link preview) are unchanged from a year ago. That’s basically all I care about.
1
6