Conversation

Replying to
Under such conditions the system is stupid, the right barbarian wins, so you should keep firing the wrong people till you find the right person with an uncanny win percentage. And you do that up and down the stack. This actually kinda worked ~1980-2010. Hobbesian barbarian world.
2
3
TIL about Quaker management 🤓
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
It’s the slow and steady—and safe and robust—committee work approach taken to the level of trying to make the right¹ decision for this generation, rather than this day, week, month, quarter, year, or even decade. See qfp.quaker.org.uk/passage/3-04/ et seq. — ¹ right ≈ the will of God
1
6
I think Covid caused Satrapy failures AND committee failures all over the world. Neither systemic knowledge nor tacit barbarian knowledge proved entirely adequate despite all the cross-accusations. And both had successes as well.
1
5
State responses worked to the extent long-term pandemic preparedness — committee stuff — produced capabilities that hadn’t been decimated by privatization. Also original R&D into mRNA etc was committee world. Points to committee world. Bad messaging, slow responses… points off.
1
5
Satrapy world gets points for Zoom, rapid rewiring of broken supply chains, high speed transition to remote work, improv mask production, rapid vaccine dev from the basic science. Points docked for running way too lean, profiteering, stealing PPP, terrible worker conditions.
1
5
And yeah, DAOs are promising as a synthesis mode, but most people I hear rhapsodize about them seem to have zero experience managing anything of consequence with or without them, in either satrapy or committee mode. They’re code-happy. So I’m just observing for now.
1
12
The core problem is psychological, social and epistemic. Not tech. Satrapies solve for special Great Man approaches and they mostly turn out to be ordinary egotists or have feet of clay. Committees solve for ordinary people approaches and stifle genuine greatness where it exists.
1
8
My bias is towards ordinary because I think most people are ordinary, including me. The percentage of genuinely great people (either intrinsic or circumstantial) is overstated by a factor of 10,000x especially in the US. For every Steve Jobs there are 9999 Elizabeth Holmeses.
2
13
Fun fact, thus thread inspired by mild annoyance at the proliferation of useless collective nouns in English which got ne thinking about the opposite phenomenon where we erase genuine distinctions between collective forms.
Quote Tweet
The real collective noun for everything is “bunch”
Show this thread
1
4
Replying to
Yet another thing to file under “thing I’d turn into a course if I had time off from making money to develop one”
4
8