There are some kinds of expertise that are defined more by the risks you take than by the skills with which you tackle those risks.
Conversation
This often gets conflated with the theory/practice divide but isn't the same. Eg: a really good marksman who lacks the courage to go on the battlefield isn't a "theorist" exactly, but has the wrong balance of risk-taking and skill.
2
11
You want more bravery in a soldier even if you have to give up some marksmanship.
1
9
This is one reason I can't take "ethicist" seriously... it's one of those roles. Real ethicists take risks that can, in the worst case, get them killed, like Aaron Swartz. An academic ethicist who insists on their "expertise" from having studied ethics theories is... 🙄
2
3
33
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
At the cost of 99% running something between grifts and scold theaters. The ratio of counterproductive to unproductive to productive is terrible. It had all the profound social costs of religion in modernity with none of the benefits of community and ceremony.
1
4
