Conversation

Replying to
The story is written to paint a sympathetic portrait of this last group. Every other actor is obviously an unsympathetic corporate-bureaucratic villain (PG&E, insurance, state and fed agencies) but these people who choose to live in these areas are portrayed as hero-victims 🙄
1
12
Their plight is bad and I do feel sorry… but their whole damn lifestyle is so NOT off the grid, their posture of fiercely independent backwoods people is sheer hypocrisy. They run on generator power, cheap Walmart camping supplies, RVs, various government support systems…
1
35
Ie they’re as complicit in the state of affairs as those of us living in less risky areas. They’re not living hunter-gatherer off-grid lives. I’m kinda glad rebuilding has been slow and high friction (for the wrong reasons… state and PG&E). These areas should NOT be rebuilt.
2
16
The only responsible path forward is to limit human presence in wildfire risk areas to a) minimal advanced infrastructure that necessarily must pass through (upgraded high safety power lines) and b) wilderness management agencies who are hopefully learning better forestry by now
1
21
Forcing “off the grid” people to meet ridiculous building codes in places nobody should build in the first place is paving the wrong cowpaths. Move the damn cows to safer places.
1
13
In general, this is an early case study in what climate change related politics and displacement will look like. And I’m well aware that LA is nearly as ridiculous a place to live, cf water scarcity, etc.
2
19
But given a global population pushing 8 billion, some high-risk areas are going to have to be occupied. The American southwest in unfortunately one of them.
1
8
I have no real skin in this CA fire situation since I’m a renter and will likely not live in CA long term (doing some hard and unsuccessful thinking about where to move to next and hopefully for the last time — “retire there” intent move), but drawing some real lessons here.
2
13
Climate resiliency is now in my top 5 factors to consider, making “where to live” an even more insanely hard problem. It wasn’t even on the list a decade ago. And it’s compounded by the fact that my horizons have lengthened. Tired of moving around.
4
34
Replying to and
Boulder is probably fine for your average person for the next decade or two. Especially if wealthy. Private services will keep the town fine. I am more of a doomer so not my preference for risk and quality of life
2
1
Show replies