if you're serious about climate, tune out anyone who spends any time thinking about these things
Conversation
(as in, prioritizing them for activist attention to shut down)
1
12
Personally, I try not to lose sight of this pie chart of actual priorities.
4
9
59
If you hit electricity and heat production, transportation, and buildings, you'll be halfway done. Industry is interesting. What's easy will be done fast, but what's hard is really hard (blast furnaces etc). I suspect ag and forestry is the hardest.
5
3
29
The three big motives I see among people who get climate-active are:
1. Being against capitalism, billionaires/right-wing politics (70%)
2. Having a very strong social service/justice orientation (20%)
3. Being interested in technology of surviving into the anthropocene (10%)
1
7
46
If you're in category 1, it's 50-50 whether you're part of the problem or the solution
If you're in category 2, you're part of the solution, but to sideshow problems (tough to hear but true)
If you're in category 3, you have a shot at being a serious part of the solution
1
5
34
Technology really is the only way out. Nothing else acts fast enough. If you're trying to start some sort of religion of post-capitalist sustainable permaculture, good for you, but religions take centuries to establish, not decades.
3
10
57
Replying to
Where doomsday devices are in this picture? I.e. make a virus that is more deadlier the more co2 is in the air.
1
Replying to
These are more of a late stage try-to-solve-it-ing, while i wonder about cults of kill all humans.
1

