Starting another book Simon Winchester’s Perfectionists, on the history of precision. I think recommended it to me.
Conversation
Replying to
About 50% done. Finished chapter on Rolls Royce vs Ford and into chapter on jet engines. The book itself is a bit too pop-tech style for me (I prefer less style, richer detail/insight, this is all “on a sunny day in March, a gangly man shuffled…”). Still, thought provoking.
2
6
General theme that occurs to me is that hardware progresses when you can make things mechanically/geometrically simpler and accommodate more extreme physics through increased precision.
Eg: jet engines are simpler than reciprocating, but work at far higher temps/pressures.
1
3
10
Though the big reason for EVs is emissions, the transformative impact is coming from the vast simplification. 1 complex engine+transmission is replaced with 4 simpler motors, intelligence moves into electronics and software, physics gets more extreme (lithium battery charging).
2
9
Probably debatable, but internal combustion physics is in many ways less extreme than managing huge battery packs. More exotic materials, more fine-grained control to make it work. IC engines need a handful of valves programmable with a camshaft. Batteries… need a computer.
1
1
15
There’s some sort of value migration chain from visible and legible to invisible and illegible. IC engines can be understood with a visual gif. Motors need classical physics math and metaphors. Battery chemistry gets you into atomic physics.
1
1
8
EUV is insane. I had no idea it was this bizarre. So this shit is going to get us down to <1nm in a decade or so huh
1
3
23
Replying to
Yea, nice - let me know what you think!
Next thing you know you'll be doing a 3 plate lap:
1
2
Does it talk about those machining blocks that are so smooth they stick together?
1
3
Show replies


