Conversation

Replying to
There was an interesting shift in his cosmetic elites were seen as compromised in the 40s or so. “Selling out” meant selling out to true-elite patrons before mass media. Now it means selling out to normie crowds. Pandering to client values rather than modeling intrinsic ones.
1
23
Admired elites typically are seen as embodiments of specific universally admirable virtues (eg: soldiers = courage). Cosmetic elites embody derived virtues at best (eg acting or writing about courage). Pursuit of “artistic truth” itself is never admired as a virtue.
1
22
So a very interesting possibility now is a Baudrillardian possibility: there are no true elites left because *all* elites have been revealed to be cosmetic elites. Simulations of simulations with no “virtues” at any limit points. Kardashians all the way up.
3
73
In this view to unironically believe in an elite is to unironically believe in a virtue, and be trapped in the associated false consciousness/blue pill. Courage theater, altruism theater, compassion theater, intellect theater, etc etc.
3
21
This is a kind of nihilism that’s always there among a subset of elites themselves (the “it’s all fake” style of condescension), but is uncommon as a mass attitude. Non-elites tend to hold at least 1-2 elite classes/embodied virtues as actually, unironically sacred.
3
18
I didn’t leave them out. I just don’t consider them elites by any meaningful candidate definition of elites. Historically they were often slaves (eg gladiators, harem entertainers, court jesters). At best they are like divine slaves-to-society like vestal virgins, devdasis etc.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
Somewhere you left out athletes. And movie stars. And other populist figures.
3
14
Replying to
Does it matter whether YOU think them elites? I thought you were measuring whether people in the population you’re examining (Western nations) were thinking it. I must’ve misunderstood your analysis.
1