Socialist eras keep trying to install a humble non-elite role in the admired role (farmer, ordinary conscript anonymous soldier as opposed to elite decorated officer hero like Patton) but it never quite works. People want names to celebrate and actual airbrushed stories.
Conversation
And speaking of airbrushing, I don’t think what I call cosmetic elites (actors, musicians, comedians, artists, writers, academics) ever rise to top-tier elite status because they are seen as only reflecting and showcasing the real doer elites at best, and bought-off at worst.
4
1
20
There was an interesting shift in his cosmetic elites were seen as compromised in the 40s or so. “Selling out” meant selling out to true-elite patrons before mass media. Now it means selling out to normie crowds. Pandering to client values rather than modeling intrinsic ones.
1
23
Admired elites typically are seen as embodiments of specific universally admirable virtues (eg: soldiers = courage). Cosmetic elites embody derived virtues at best (eg acting or writing about courage). Pursuit of “artistic truth” itself is never admired as a virtue.
1
1
22
People who think hodlers are the new elites are in a very serious bubble.
3
1
41
So a very interesting possibility now is a Baudrillardian possibility: there are no true elites left because *all* elites have been revealed to be cosmetic elites. Simulations of simulations with no “virtues” at any limit points. Kardashians all the way up.
3
6
74
In this view to unironically believe in an elite is to unironically believe in a virtue, and be trapped in the associated false consciousness/blue pill.
Courage theater, altruism theater, compassion theater, intellect theater, etc etc.
3
3
22
This is a kind of nihilism that’s always there among a subset of elites themselves (the “it’s all fake” style of condescension), but is uncommon as a mass attitude. Non-elites tend to hold at least 1-2 elite classes/embodied virtues as actually, unironically sacred.
3
2
18
Another interesting proposition. But then I’ve never seen a meme hero like “Chad” either leak out of subcultural zone or clearly map to any real group. Imaginary elites, like wizards?
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
If I wanted "generally unqualified positive societal regard," I'd be the good guy in a new meme format.
1
11
🤔 yeah...
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
I think an important variant of c) is the history of “mass culture” being written from within the dominant but far from universal culture; it’s much clearer now that there is no coherent “mass” that covers everyone.
1
20
I didn’t leave them out. I just don’t consider them elites by any meaningful candidate definition of elites. Historically they were often slaves (eg gladiators, harem entertainers, court jesters). At best they are like divine slaves-to-society like vestal virgins, devdasis etc.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
Somewhere you left out athletes. And movie stars. And other populist figures.
Replying to
They may become true elites if they make a ton of money and retreat from the limelight (a relatively new possibility created by mass media and royalties/residuals/advertising), but so long as they are servants of spotlights rather than masters, they aren’t elites.
1
11
Cute, but no. Every generation has a vanguard ‘cool’ that rides a new medium to assert cultural presence, but it basically has nothing to do with elite roles in society, even if a few get rich. twitter.com/farmer_rho/sta
This Tweet is unavailable.
3
18
This is intriguing but I think flawed. Elite-makers are not elites because unlike monarchs of yore, journalists etc cannot guarantee anything. Their influence is unpredictably catalytic rather than determinative. Same goes for algorithms. Maybe Putin/Xi still have such power?
Quote Tweet
Replying to @vgr
Proposed elite definition: You're elite if you get to decide who's elite. Then
1965-2015: journalists — and in particular news anchors. 2015-2019: comedians
2020- : Algorithms (which prefer no one to be elite)
2
1
17
You can see the search for new elites in the efforts to install new virtues (new sincerity, trad, post-irony, epistemic hygiene, climate consciousness) that flounder because they’re like trying to ‘make fetch happen.’ Can’t install new virtues without electing new elites.
4
2
16
Normally the way to model the situation would be to treat this as an emerging elites market with no clear monopolistic winners yet. But I’m no longer sure there IS a market here. It’s worse than crypto. People are only hodling shitcoin candidate-elites and there’s no bitcoin.
4
13
Another sign: apparently everybody turned into an accredited investor in the last couple of years there’s been a glut of “small gods” trying to establish themselves as niche elites (contradiction in terms?) through special-snowflake virtue investing. It’s the new virtue signaling
2
21
How to lose a bunch of friends with a single tweet 🤣
1
19
To be fair, also true of the writerly commentariat class to which I belong. Trawling for new candidate elites to pump up so we can free-ride. We just invest with words rather than dollars. But hard to do with so few candidates around.
4
14
Nobody seems particularly eager to do the messianic sacrifice thing that would sustain a decent pumping effort with money or words.
3
8
Replying to
Does it matter whether YOU think them elites? I thought you were measuring whether people in the population you’re examining (Western nations) were thinking it.
I must’ve misunderstood your analysis.
1
Replying to
It’s not about me. I’m trying to apply a consistent historical standard of “elite” and a few objective criteria like being seen as legitimate stewards of a society’s values and grand narrative.
1
1
Show replies




