ah damn...liquid resistance....
In principle tho if there were a gravity differential between the ends of the gearbox, are we doing something interesting or am I misunderstanding something other than basic laws of thermodynamics?
Conversation
Replying to
Gravity is kinda irrelevant here. Inertia is rotational. I don’t see what you’re getting at tbh. Something like a space elevator arbitrages gravity in a way.
2
Replying to
I was assuming that it takes lesser energy to drive the last gear in that 65,000:1 gearbox
in a low gravity environment in order to drive the first gear
and
generate energy.
perpetual motion zanyness....
1
Replying to
Sorry no. Linear motion would be affected until equilibrium (a balloon underwater would float to surface) but not rotational.
1
1
Replying to
I see / Thank you.
Yeah i was under a false impression that 2nd law could be cheated by using energy generated by a 1:n gear ratio by operating the nth gear in 0 gravity.
1
What's happening here?
Resistances ought not to make this possible, no?
Craft that's harvesting? wind energy into kinetic but also geared to push itself ahead of the wind....?
youtu.be/jyQwgBAaBag
1
Replying to
Dunno. Would have to do the vector math. The prop is acting like 2 tacking sails canceling out lateral forces I think. It shouldn’t be compared to pure downwind like a spinnaker.
2

