So you talk about earlier and later scenes. You can only go from earlier to later. These are not references to maturity level but exit order. If it looks like you’re going backwards it is always through irony or a related mode. Later scenes will be more dissonant.
Conversation
Scenes form a developmental partially ordered sequence. So a question like “where do you go if you leave tech role in Silicon Valley?” is well-posed. You’re unlikely to go get an MBA and join Wall Street for eg, but likely to go to LA and get into entertainment media.
1
11
Finance scene is upstream of tech, which is upstream of media. Fin tech is post-tech and ironically-fin.
1
7
It’s a partial order so you can move to any scene that is not-upstream. Even reactionary moves are fundamentally ironic. Tech to trad is not the same as just being trad. So not-upstream.
1
7
I’m currently very curious about “post-tech” scenes. I have an inventory but not a map: crypto, entertainment, trad, waldenponding, neoreaction, local politics, biotech. Each is post in a different way.
Tech is a bottleneck scene. Everything is either pre-tech or post-tech.
3
4
25
It is locally total order. Only 1 scene at a time is the bottleneck usually. Other scenes don’t induce total pre/post cuts.
2
7
Replying to
Well if there’s a net direction locally (A to be is more likely than B to A) for every pair with significant flow, you’ll get at least a local order. I suspect if you impose a minimum net flow threshold to filter random noise you’ll get a proper DAG.
1
1
2
Replying to
That’s what makes this a non-trivial thesis though... that in general you’d think it does but it doesn’t... like everywhere in the world theist —> atheist is probably a routine teenage flow but the other way is a rare thing, hence net decline in macro-level religiosity
1
1

