“Indian-on-Indian” sociopath executive violence in companies with strong Indian presence in managerial ranks is a sight to behold and Americans are often entirely unaware of it. I’m guessing Chinese, Korean etc have similar dynamics.
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
I think it’s a minus. Breeding cluelessness through structural enabling is a kind of elite overproduction. Even if it’s of otherwise underrepresented minorities. This is why I have little patience for standard diversity initiatives. They adversely select for cluelessness.
1
6
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
I think a stiff dose of sociopath Darwinist assholery is actually necessary for building good businesses. The optimal amount is not zero. Pure idealist-run businesses are horrible and if they survive at all, take a darker turn than ones that embrace a bit of dark side upfront.
1
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
There is. It’s not a way but being more invested in the the thing itself rather than how it is done or who does it. The Augean stables are cleansed by the power of a sufficiently impersonal larger goal. Like moonshot large.
1
1
It’s brain dead obvious that NASA is a place to be only if you care about space. The money isn’t worth it, neither is the political power or minor celebrity 15 minutes of fame.
2
3
Something to be said for nerdy government agencies with mediocre pay
1
3
Yeah. Note the impressive diversity on display around the Perseverance launch. The marketing of it was very heavy-handed and overwrought but the people profiled seemed real, not tokens in diversity theater.

