Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
The identity group in the #2 position on any hierarchy is often the most politically savvy. Most to gain, least oppressed, not complacent. The Avis line “we try harder because we’re number 2” applies.
1
8
Replying to and
All of OP applies to Asian men too, especially FOBs, who additionally bring novel Asian gamesmanship to the party to which American corps have low immunity. There’s a reason so many Indian CEOs in SV are India-born. It’s a decent but invisible (like 30%) part of my shtick too 🤣
1
10
Replying to and
The Karen/Karan factor. Karan incidentally is an Indian male name that refers to a noble but flawed prince who fights on the wrong side of the Mahabharata against his own brothers because he was given up for adoption and made some questionable life choices as well.
2
7
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
I think it’s a minus. Breeding cluelessness through structural enabling is a kind of elite overproduction. Even if it’s of otherwise underrepresented minorities. This is why I have little patience for standard diversity initiatives. They adversely select for cluelessness.
1
6
Show replies