Conversation

Gotta appreciate the sincerity of intent behind such things, but seriously, if this is the sort of thing people are pinning their hopes on in the post-real permaweird we’re in for some serious hilarity. More likely it will turn into yet another larp like “civil debate”
1
35
I feel bad about ripping on the diagram, but I’ll admit I’ve not liked anything I’ve seen of Adam Grant’s work. Far too TEDdy for my tastes. I liked some bits of McCarthy’s bullshit paper though, also linked in the OT.
5
24
Show replies
Replying to
100%. It's the idealized scientist, not actual scientists. I'd replace the top level with 's definition of the metarationalist. Their mantra would be something like, "my working definition of right/wrong may be unfit for this context."
Show more replies