Conversation

Gotta appreciate the sincerity of intent behind such things, but seriously, if this is the sort of thing people are pinning their hopes on in the post-real permaweird we’re in for some serious hilarity. More likely it will turn into yet another larp like “civil debate”
1
35
I feel bad about ripping on the diagram, but I’ll admit I’ve not liked anything I’ve seen of Adam Grant’s work. Far too TEDdy for my tastes. I liked some bits of McCarthy’s bullshit paper though, also linked in the OT.
Replying to
CRITICAL THINKER beats CONTRARIAN CONTRARIAN beats POLITICIAN POLITICIAN beats CRITICAL THINKER CULT LEADER beats SCIENTIST SCIENTIST beats nothing
3
Replying to
I‘ve started reading his latest book and felt the same. But it’s hard to stand your ground if a whole marketing machinery and a network of highly visible individuals argue that it’s the best thing since sliced bread. Feels a bit like being in the Asch conformity experiments.
1