Conversation

Economics/finance thought leaders always sound far more confident and reassuring than social/cultural ones. The former seem to shoot for an explainer tone, while the latter seem to go for either a tentative or provocative tone. I understand the former better, but trust them less.
2
43
Former are like, “when interest rates deleverage the SPACs, the yield curve commoditizes the complement via aggregation of stock buybacks, and of course the SEC will frown on that sort of covfefe.” It will take you 3 minutes of headache to follow the heist-movie logic.
1
21
Latter are like, “Well, from a post-Deleuzean metamodern anti-anti-structuralist perspective, high incarceration rates are clearly performed as a narrative of redemptive recongealment. It’s a case of Butler’s axe meets Buridan’s Ass! Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur”
1
11
When you parse the gobbledygook, you realize instead of fragile, over-complex heist movie logic, you have intricate epicycles created by layers of indirection whose sole purpose is to situate a banal thought in a favored discourse rather than add useful detail. Compiler cruft.
2
24
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more